@lynnsander

Code update frequency reflects development activity and team commitment. Regular commits on GitHub or similar repositories suggest active progress, bug fixes, and feature rollouts. However, raw frequency alone can be misleading—frequent trivial updates do not necessarily indicate meaningful innovation. Investors should evaluate the quality of changes, developer engagement, and milestone delivery alongside frequency. Long gaps in updates may signal stagnation, abandonment, or lack of resources. Consistent, substantive code contributions paired with transparent roadmaps provide stronger evidence of long-term sustainability and project reliability.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction