logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘

@logonaut.eth

3862 Following
4790 Followers


logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
It has never been easier to write a message to your leaders opposing U.S. involvement in another unnecessary foreign war. Pick an AI agent, give it a brief prompt summing up what you want to say, and then π™Žπ™€π™‰π˜Ώ 𝙄𝙏 ↗️ 𝙂𝙀𝙏 π™‡π™Šπ™π˜Ώ πŸ”Š https://x.com/repthomasmassie/status/1935001863100699058?s=46
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
🀝 750 $DEGEN 🀌🎩
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
cheers! ✊
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
πŸ₯Ί
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
https://x.com/kziabari/status/1935030829056491921?s=46
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
The international Committee to Protect Journalists, one of the leading advocates of press freedom around the world, condemns Israel's attack on an Iranian state broadcasting organization that killed one journalist and one media worker. Meanwhile, U.S.-based pro-Israel advocacy group the Anti-Defamation League defends the fatal attack on civilians because it takes issue with their biased reporting.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
If Sen. Lindsey Graham wants boots on the ground in Iran, I'll send him a pair. I believe he wears a size dickhead-and-a-half.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
I asked Claude Opus 4 for an analysis of risks to Israel, the occupied territories, and U.S. assets from nuclear strikes of various yields on Iranian targets, particularly in June. I prompted Claude to examine academic and military research on such scenarios, determine if there’s scientific consensus, and base its analysis on the most rigorous, evidence-based modeling publicly available. From the executive summary Claude generated: "Nuclear strikes on Iranian targets would create devastating transboundary contamination affecting the entire Middle East region. Based on atmospheric dispersion modeling and historical fallout data, even 'limited' strikes would contaminate Israel, Palestinian territories, and U.S. military installations across the Gulf region. June meteorological conditions would maximize downwind transport, creating an unprecedented humanitarian and military catastrophe."
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
my wife and I are dog people, but Curiosity is a real sweetheart β€” though a little opportunistic as we were eating dinner out there πŸ˜†
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
Her name is Curiosity. Lazily gazing westward from our Airbnb balcony in Barbados, past a stately row of three coconut palms, as a pair of hummingbirds flit and chirp among the fronds, a pair of doves coo and nuzzle one another in the tree canopy, and the sun makes its evening descent toward the horizon, glinting off the clear blue water of the Caribbean. Waves gently lap the sandy beach below, and for a few sweet moments I forget the world beyond and am happy.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
That sounds right. Part of the "Belt and Road" initiative, maybe?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
πŸ€” I wonder if Iran could *sustainably* disrupt petroleum transport through the Strait of Hormuz by simultaneously building an alternative energy alliance that bypasses Gulf shipping entirely. Rather than simply blockading the strait and absorbing economic punishment, Iran would offer preferential extraction rights and pipeline deals to key allies (primarily China and Russia; maybe Pakistan) similar to the arrangements it had with Western powers prior to the 1953 CIA-orchestrated coup when PM Mossadegh led the charge to nationalize the Iranian oil industry. This creates a two-pronged strategy: while Western economies suffer from Gulf shipping disruption and oil price spikes, Iran maintains revenue streams through land-based energy partnerships with major powers who have strategic incentives to politically protect Iran’s actions. The approach transforms a desperate military gambit into calculated alliance-building, where Iran leverages its energy resources to fracture the international response rather than face it alone. In this scenario, Iran would use energy diplomacy to ensure its major-power allies benefit from the crisis rather than suffer from it, making them reluctant to support military intervention against Iranian actions in the Gulf. This assumes, though, that China and Russia would prioritize guaranteed energy access and higher global prices over maintaining the current international order, especially if offered direct stakes in Iranian energy infrastructure. But could Iran build sufficient alternative delivery capacity and political cover before economic or military pressures force their hand in the Gulf? Maybe already too late for such a gambit to have any chance of success?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
I genuinely wonder if he ever reads his old social posts and, if so, what goes through his mind when he does. Like, is it just a mental shrug? Or maybe a self-congratulatory "good job on remaining flexible and adaptable"?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
My message that I sent to U.S. Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz (both R-Texas), calibrated to try to appeal to their conservative, nationalist sensibilities: Keep the U.S. military out of the Israel-Iran war. Any military "solution" would be far too costly in American blood and treasure for a nation that is already deeply in debt to foreign powers and which already struggles to meet its honor-bound obligation to care for its veterans and meet their physical and mental health needs arising from their military service. Your president and party leader campaigned on a pledge to "make America great again," stating: "When I return to the White House, we will quickly restore stability in the Middle East, and we will return the world to peace.” Americans don't want to become embroiled in yet another foreign war. We don't want the Netanyahu government dictating American foreign policy and use of military force β€” that is a projection of weakness, not strength, and the world will take notice. We are no one's lapdog. If you truly believe in an "America First" doctrine, you must vote NO on military intervention in the Israel-Iran war and do the hard work of brokering a lasting peace. Iran has a relatively young population, most of whom loathe Khamenei and his autocratic security apparatus. They seek peace, prosperity, and normalization of relations with the U.S. and other Western nations, where many of them already have family ties via immigration. Don't unite them against the U.S. by attacking their homeland and enabling Israeli aggression. Khamenei and the rest of the geriatric old guard are already dying off naturally, and the youth are primed to rise to power and reform their country from within, as long as America doesn't repeat its past mistakes and radicalize them with death, injury, and destruction. Show the people of Texas you truly love America and want it strong, secure, and prosperous: vote NO on war with Iran.
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
Here's evangelical Christian Mike Huckabee, U.S. ambassador to Israel, encouraging Trump to launch a nuclear attack on Iran and β€” implicit to his theological worldview that welcomes end-times scenarios β€” usher in armageddon and bring about the rapture. I really don't think there's much ambiguity to his "Truman in 1945" rhetoric as a reference to the U.S. dropping atomic bombs on Japan.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
Israel ramping up its domestic censorship apparatus ... β€œThe photographers and reporters on the spot were checked, and it was found that they were not Al Jazeera or Al Mayadeen reporters, but rather other foreign broadcasting channels, for which there is no blanket prohibition on filming – as long as they did not violate censorship regulations." β€” office of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/ben-gvir-says-police-hunting-down-anyone-filming-missile-strike-locations-celebrating-iran/
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi, awarded "for her fight against the oppression of women in Iran and her fight to promote human rights and freedom for all" https://x.com/nargesfnd/status/1934878447060340887?s=46
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘
@logonaut.eth
"Zahra Shams, 35, was a devout Muslim who wore the hijab by choice but vocally opposed its enforcement on others, even tweeting in support of the anti-hijab protests in 2022. She was killed in a strike intended for a regime official who lived in her apartment building."
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions