909 Followers
@clanker do you have a cli, if so, where's the doc about it
I was so wrong about openclaw being smoke and mirror.
Okay, I see some use cases for an agentic token with ecosystem incentives, similar to how yield-bearing assets function...
Just shipped a small utility: you can now swap your tips into ETH or USDC directly on Farcaster. Unfortunately, the Farcaster wallet doesn’t support EIP-7702 yet, so batching isn’t possible for now but it’s still a much simpler way to convert dust into usable tokens. Enjoy!
Let's run a little social experiment: the first 50 people to comment will be added as fee recipients. Token plan? Honestly, just memeing for now, but if this takes off, we might cook something up!
Zora, this is getting old. Every year it’s the same playbook. NFTs are the future. Then creator coins are the future. Then attention markets are the future. Now it’s “the attention market,” again, on a new chain, with the same recycled moral pitch about empowering creators. It’s not innovation. It’s narrative whiplash. You don’t build ecosystems, you harvest momentum. You show up where attention is hot, dress it up as infrastructure, extract liquidity, social capital, and creator labor, then quietly move on once the hype curve flattens. What’s left behind is a graveyard of half-finished promises and people who actually believed this time was different. Iteration is fine. Experimentation is fine. What’s not fine is pretending each pivot is some principled evolution when it’s obviously trend-chasing. If you actually believed in any of these models long term, you’d commit to one long enough for it to mature instead of torching the narrative every time something shinier pops up. Creators pay the price for this, every single time. They’re told to migrate, rebrand, re-educate their audience, rebuild liquidity, rebuild trust. Then you pull the rug narratively and act like that was always the plan. It’s not “permissionless.” It’s disposable. At this point, the only consistent thing about Zora is the inconsistency. The product changes, the chain changes, the thesis changes, but the extraction stays the same. So yeah, miss me with the grand vision tweets/casts. If the endgame is always “capture attention, drain it, move on,” just say that. Don’t dress it up as a revolution for creators when you’re clearly just passing through. You’re not building the future. You’re speedrunning it, then throwing it in the trash when you’re done.
With Clout I’m trying something different. Lately everything feels like “make more tokens, charge for everything”, followers pay for content, platforms take their cut, creators grind harder. I want to flip that dynamic, while giving tooling for creators. This space keeps extracting from the audience, but it’s time to give value back. With Clout, creators can reward their followers for the attention they give and if you love someone’s work, you can even boost their content.