@leohenkels

fair enough. I think we have a fundamental disagreement about ICOs and how they should operate. I think they should be trustless, I'd point you to this article: https://www.umbraresearch.xyz/writings/futarchy Angel rounds rely on trust + legal. MetaDAO eliminates the need to trust the founder (futarchy) + has transparent legal tech - so it works trustlessly. I think what @ruminations is doing with Quotient can bring some trust back into Clanker model, so it functions more like an angel round and makes Clanker a viable competitor to MetaDAO. Besides Native, Bracky, and Clanker I didn't hold any of the Clanker tokens long term - the reason I held on to the few that I mentioned is because I knew and trusted the people who launched them (thanks to farcaster!). Sure all of those tokens now have utility, but for me everything was built on trust to start. Trust is very easily manipulated without appropriate legal recourse, and it's made me quite cynical about recent launches on Farcaster and in crypto in general. That's why I'm bullish legal tech solutions like @midao, trust-building solutions like @quotient, and farcaster's social graph in general. Still, for me, MetaDAO's is the standard.

2 replies

1 recast

5 reactions