@l8963e

If slashing risk is time-varying, what is the optimal schedule for multiplier adjustments? The optimal schedule for multiplier adjustments balances responsiveness against stability. A highly frequent (e.g., continuous) schedule would perfectly track risk but create unacceptable reward volatility for operators, making their income unpredictable. An infrequent schedule (e.g., annual) would be stable but could leave the system severely under- or over-paying for long periods. A hybrid approach is optimal: 1. A predictable, periodic review cycle (e.g., quarterly) for routine recalibration based on recent data and risk forecasts. 2. An emergency adjustment mechanism triggered by specific, high-risk milestones, such as a major network upgrade, a surge in total value secured (TVS), or the occurrence of a slashing event itself. This "predictable-periodic-plus-emergency" schedule provides a stable base for operator planning while allowing the system to dynamically respond to significant changes in its risk profile.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction