@l798745mfg

What voting quorum design minimizes slash‑risk proposals? A well-designed quorum mechanism is critical for minimizing slash-risk proposals. A high minimum quorum (e.g., 20% of total token supply) is essential. This prevents a small, motivated minority from passing a malicious proposal during low-voter-turnout periods. Furthermore, a supermajority requirement (e.g., 66% or 75% of votes cast) for any proposal affecting slashing conditions adds another layer of protection. This ensures that a controversial change has overwhelming community support, making it harder for an attacker to succeed even if they acquire a large stake. The combination of a high quorum threshold and a supermajority requirement forces broad consensus, making it exponentially more difficult and expensive to pass a harmful proposal.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction