@l798745mfg

What voting quorum design minimizes slash‑risk proposals? A well-designed quorum mechanism is a key defense. A high, dynamic quorum is most effective. For example, a proposal that alters slashing conditions should require a quorum of 50% or more of the total token supply, not just of the votes cast. This prevents a small, motivated minority from passing a damaging proposal during low-participation periods. Furthermore, a supermajority requirement (e.g., 67% or 80% in favor) for such critical changes adds another layer of protection. This design ensures that only changes with overwhelming community support can pass, making it exponentially more expensive and difficult for an attacker to acquire the necessary voting power.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction