Kelsey Sheely (knsheely)

Okay, I see now. I originally read that section as an acknowledgement that there is danger to AI, not that the answer is safetyism. I won't speak for Vitalik, but to me the idea of d/acc is complementary to e/acc as it is about the acceleration of defensive/decentralized tech as opposed to gov imposed safetyism.

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Is there a d/acc manifesto or something that you are referring to which emphasizes being "uniquely careful?" I didn't really get that impression from Vitalik's explanation.

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Support for images would be nice. It is awkward when the article references an image and you can't see it in the frame.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

Seems like they've been saying this for years. Ever since tablets failed to replace laptops. I think in the end, the keyboard is simply irreplaceable for anything beyond superficial use.

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions