keccers
@keccers.eth
The fully doxxed have more skin in the game than the pseuds, which is why it’s perplexing to me how in many instances pseuds are more easily able to accrue trust A pseud’s opinion should be doubly discounted. They have no reputation risk
25 replies
7 recasts
89 reactions
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
What a load of crap. You don't have to have a name to gain trust, just verifiable history of decent behaviour.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
People don’t even bother to verify ….
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
That's on them not the anon account
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
No, but then again I am not saying there should be no anons I am saying anons have less skin in the game overall and that the diligence is even more critical on everything they say, because they can say anything and be anyone at any time
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
Not with a verifiable onchain history, doxxed or not. Even a verificable history of interactions personally or within a group. That is skin in the game. That is a reputation to protect. It's an online (or on chain) identity and it's important to protect that whether doxxed or not. Saying people have less skin in the game if they are not doxxed is not taking into account that onchain anonymous identities are as important to the real person behind that identity as their real life identity would be if using that. Wishing to keep a real life identity private is not an identification that someone is less trustworthy. It's important to protect the right for people to be anonymous if they want to. Make your trust assumptions based on what they put online, not on the fact they are hiding their real life identity.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
