Seems plausible. Not much incentive for the surplus to be given back to the employer. Need better incentives.

If we're not seeing more economic impact of AI in terms of GDP growth, in my opinion, it's mostly because gains and controls are concentrated in a few companies (mostly big tech and a couple of big startups) because of the lack of open infrastructure, open science and open-source

Here's my "Dark Leisure" theory of any potential productivity paradox in AI:

- most AI use rn is bottom up and hidden (employee first, not company first): employees vibe code, vibe market, vibe write and get stuff done faster

- in many orgs, there is too little incentive to

fabian

Seems plausible. Not much incentive for the surplus to be given back to the employer. Need better incentives. 

https://x.com/fabianstelzer/status/1926000937702764635

I half thought I could create a “vibe code” class for enterprise, similar to how I got offered Second City improv training for better presentations when I was in corporate

Surveying my corporate friends disabused me quickly 

They either a) don’t know how to maximize usage or b) hide it 

There is strong sense if they tell they will lose their jobs and don’t want to hasten that process