The fully doxxed have more skin in the game than the pseuds, which is why it’s perplexing to me how in many instances pseuds are more easily able to accrue trust 

A pseud’s opinion should be doubly discounted. They have no reputation risk

a lot of people think i'm a pseud, but my handle is more doxxed (fully unique and easy to map to real identity) than my government name (extremely common to the point that i get many recruiters reaching out conflating the experience of many people with my name at the same time, i even made andreypetrov.com)

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

A doodler and computerer. I like permissive/permissionless open source, smart contracts, p2p systems, room-scale VR, and NixOS.

shazow.net

Currently: WhatsABI

Heck, even my own username sort of straddles this same boundary 

I feel bad about making this post bc a) I think it was interpreted as an anti anon thing which I did not intend b) reminded me of how evil the world has gotten; people are fearful and feel like anon is mandatory

i think the concept of what it means to be anon is evolving, in kind of a romantic interesting way

i also think that people should try maintaining an anon with all the opsec that comes with it,
1. it's good practice and raises awareness about important things we don't normally think about 
2. it's really fucking hard!!