I just scored 1742 in Chog vs Cat Girls! Think you can outplay me and protect the Chogdom? Prove it on the battlefield! 💥⚔️

🎮 I just scored 20 in #MouchKnight! My highest score is 20. I earned 11 MKT tokens! Can you beat my score? 🏆

🎮 Just played Flappy Trump by @kshitijgajapure on Farcaster! Earn $FLAPs, NFTs, and MON while having fun! Try it now! 🚀

OpenSea

https://x.com/opensea/status/1929520970651337164

Break Monad V2 is live on @farcaster_xyz!

The dev community built fun mini apps so you can try to break Monad

Sign in and play here: https://t.co/dWpWyvUReR https://t.co/YnnQLjGtPl

Monad ⨀

https://x.com/monad_xyz/status/1929931884617744572

Donald J. Trump

https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1928797140408533377

https://x.com/monad_xyz/status/1928455523545854155

Looking for input

Assume we want to simplify channels to make them:

1. Fully decentralized, zero Farcaster app dependencies
2. Allow other clients to extend them
3. No cost to create them

Which option is most appealing?

A) Hashtag approach — channels are open to everyone, channel pages look less like profiles and instead are a simple feed of casts. There’s no moderation — the feed is unique to each viewer based on their own social graph and maybe a user-controlled setting around filtering. 

B) Niche interest approach — Channels are open to everyone and narrowcast only, ie you get no distribution boost. But allows you to cast in a channel knowing only people interested in that topic will see it.

Assume in both cases membership and moderation in the main Farcaster app would go away. PYou’d be free to use a channel focused client for more community features. 

This is not an imminent change, more gathering input for what matters to people who still use channels.

Rewards

Unsolicited design feedback: bump the arch down a few pixels so the center of mass is closer to the center of the starburst.

Hi, everyone, I'm now using warpcast, so happy

kazhifei

@kazhifei