Each goal has clear leads, ensuring the EF’s resources are allocated towards maximal impact. 

- Scale L1: @ansgar.eth & me
- Scale L2: @fradamt & @ralexstokes 
- Improve UX: @rudolf & @barnabe 

To top it off, @dankrad will set strategy alongside each of us!

Talk (crosschain) UX to me!

We’re looking to identify, build and support pragmatic solutions to fix some of the most common user problems on Ethereum, with an amplified focus and the means to deliver.

Protocol::Improve UX at Ethereum Foundation

https://protocol.ethereum.foundation

3SF & cheaper L1, are the only things that can improve UX. That way MMs & solvers can help users buy any token on any chain in less than 1 minute, that too in any size. L1 wins as all the liquidity is routed through it. This will kill 90% of fragmentation & UX issues .

See this debate on the question https://x.com/barnabemonnot/status/1908121756121841763

hi so I listened to the talk . 

Big agree with dankrad. Currently all L2 - L2 rebalances are being captured by CEXs, maybe espresso will capture them, will depend on their tech & BD. which is really bad for L1. I also agree with his recent postings about user accquisition on L1. I think the L1s main role should be providing confirmations. Its gonna be much easier to just do 3SF & 2-3x gas limit increase & make sure that L2 - L2 rebalances go through the L1. Then to compete with coinbase for user accquisition for eternity.

Intent based bridges like across etc. have severe limitations in terms of liquidity.