JYama(jiji.eth) (jyamamoto606)

Hi, I am the co-author of Prop 562 and the owner of noun no.606. I saw some opinions about proposals on Nouns DAO, such as: - We should create more "for us" rather than "for onboarding". - Creating products for the internal community, then people will finally find us interesting. - Those who say "onboarding" try to take money from "OGs". To be honest, I strongly disagree with these opinions and I want to summarize my thoughts about Nouns DAO to avoid misunderstanding of my proposals and article. (1/6)

• 1 reply
• 1 recast
• 4 reactions

I agree with you. Frankly, I cannot understand at all why people approve spending large sums of money on pizza parties and event sponsorships, but this proposal cannot gain approval.

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 3 reactions

Personally, I disagree with this opinion. There are so many attractive contents and activities in the world now so very few people can find nouns without "onboarding" and only arbitrageurs will come to the community, which means the DAO will die slowly. I feel important thing is to think "how" and "what" we'll do for "onboarding" rather than stopping "onboarding" and focusing on internal community.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

GM

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 3 reactions