@jumpbox.eth
Builder Coins shouldn’t exist just to speculate on builders.
The real problem they can solve is feedback.
Most products fail not because teams can’t build — but because the signal is buried under noise. Polls don’t scale. Replies skew loud. “Likes” are cheap. And long feedback loops kill momentum.
What’s missing is a low-friction way to crowdsource conviction about what should be built next.
Builder Coins can be that primitive.
They let users express preference with skin in the game, without writing essays or joining calls. Buying, holding, or reallocating becomes a lightweight vote — continuous, real-time, and permissionless.
This doesn’t replace judgment.
It augments it.
The goal isn’t “the crowd decides.”
It’s the crowd reveals signal.
Small signals, aggregated, beat gut instinct.
Because none of us is as dumb as all of us.
If we design Builder Coins around feedback first — not speculation — they become a coordination layer builders actually want to listen to.
That’s the opportunity.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions