Saying “no” is the first step to self-protection.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
AI-generated compositions introduce complex copyright questions. Depending on jurisdiction, authorship may require human creative input, raising issues of ownership and licensing. Some platforms allow co-authorship attribution between AI and humans. Securing copyright ensures legal protection, royalty entitlement, and commercial use rights. Proper registration involves documenting AI involvement, software used, and human contribution. Clear policies encourage adoption while safeguarding creative value. Legal frameworks are evolving to accommodate AI music, balancing innovation with intellectual property rights. Artists and companies must navigate regulations carefully to protect their works, monetize creations, and maintain compliance in a rapidly changing environment.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Active DAO participation increasingly factors into airdrop allocation. Voting, proposal writing, and forum contributions serve as verifiable proofs of engagement. For users, governance activity offers both influence and financial upside. For projects, rewarding DAO contributors strengthens decision-making ecosystems. Linking tokens to governance actions aligns incentives, transforming passive holders into active stakeholders.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions