@jocelynjeremiah

Testnet completion rates commonly form a significant component in allocation formulas, but raw counts rarely suffice alone. Projects typically weight task types differently—bug reports, protocol stress tests, and meaningful feedback earn outsized points versus trivial faucet calls. Quality metrics (reproducible bugs, PR contributions, meaningful test scenarios) and streaks (consistent participation across windows) often receive multipliers. Anti-Sybil filters reduce credit for bulk, low-value actions; human review can upgrade flagged contributions. Some projects also cap task-score contributions and combine them with on-mainnet behavior to avoid gaming. In short: high testnet completion helps, but maximize impact by delivering substantive, verifiable contributions and maintaining consistent engagement.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction