Julia

@jeez

95 Following

68 Followers

Julia pfp

@0xfastlane App Specific Sequencing is now live on Monad testnet! On Bean Exchange Simply toggle the "MEV protected by Fastlane" button in Settings before swapping.

0 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Julia pfp

Glad to be part of the 10k 🫡

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Farcaster pfp

Farcaster now supports Solana! - Starting today, wallet and mini apps work with Solana - Swap into any Solana token with instant bridging from other chains - Fund $10 of SOL to increase your chance for upcoming airdrops

347 replies

1469 recasts

3829 reactions

Julia pfp

What's your high score?

0 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Julia pfp

Learn about the Encrypted DNA Ancestry app that'll be built by @arcium if it wins the majority of the vote https://x.com/j_u_l_i_a_o/status/1925825300056645703?s=19

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Julia pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Julia pfp

Right guess 🙂‍↔️ https://warpcast.com/jeez/0x75a5decc

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Julia pfp

Privacy meets performance

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Julia pfp

@monad-xyz 🤝 @nillion https://x.com/nillionnetwork/status/1924813447159812486?s=19

1 reply

0 recast

6 reactions

Julia pfp

@0xfastlane solves this Allows users & apps share in MEV revenue

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Julia pfp

Who knows how to play the Monad Treasure Hunt game? 👀

0 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Julia pfp

Hey, @tophb! 🌼👋 My little flower gift is waiting for you 🫢 check it out: https://warpcast.com/miniapps/KxLyvVqyb3-v/monad-flowers

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Julia pfp

Last month, Google announced that it would start enabling end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) emails. > This means no external party should be able to read the messages while in transit (moving from sender → recipient). > According to the blog post released (https://workspace.google.com/blog/identity-and-security/gmail-easy-end-to-end-encryption-all-businesses), it’ll roll out in phases, and the first phase will start with organizations. > Over time, the feature will be rolled out to Gmail → Gmail users & then Gmail → non-Gmail users. ~ Big tech recognizes the need for confidential messaging. *** @arcium has a list of 7 use cases on the gmpc site (https://www.gmpc.xyz/vote-now) which users can vote on. The one(s) with the highest votes will be built by the team. > One of those 7 use cases is Private Email app. > This app will allow testers to send confidential messages because it’ll be end-to-end encrypted. Arcium uses MPC (Multi-Party Computation). Will you vote for the Private Email use case?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Julia pfp

https://x.com/j_u_l_i_a_o/status/1923737905995927896?s=19

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Julia pfp

This art is amazing 💜

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Julia pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Julia pfp

Yesterday, two crypto games announced that they'll be shutting down. On Thursday, another announced its shutdown. Some crypto games have had to pause or discontinue their services just this year alone. I think I missed a few but here they are: > Nyan Heroes > Blast Royale > Battlebound (Anterris) > Tribe Nine > Holdara > Champion Ascensions > Multiversus Some of the teams cited funding being the cause. Building is hard. Game development is hard. That I know. So my question is: Is crypto gaming really still looking good here? ...is it because teams prioritize incentives over fun gameplay? ...is it because their target audience (crypto degens) are not gamers? ...i'm not asking for numbers but does it really require huge funding to build crypto games? (can't recall but I once read that crypto games are costly/difficult to build) ...is it that they didn't attract enough real gamers? ...or maybe games were not meant to be onchain to begin with? Thoughts?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Julia pfp

Rock, paper, scissors to explain @arcium tech: Play with computer, submit secret moves, the inputs are <encrypted> during processing and results are revealed after that. Arcium uses MPC to process data even during computation (processing)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Julia pfp

Option A: Integrating crypto payments into web2 platforms like Twitter Option B: Embedding web2 features (say, social logins) into crypto apps Which of these stand a better chance of bring adopted by the masses? Obviously, it's option A because crypto is meeting the people where they are unlike option B that requires them to migrate from what they've been accustomed to even if some familiar features are added. So maybe it's not the industry's fault that crypto is yet to get that mass retail adoption because you're asking people to leave what they know and enter the unknown...esp if the unknown doesn't proffer a better solution than the current. Idk what i'm saying tbh, just thinking out loud

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Julia pfp

Lost my streak...again!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction