Jakey (jakeyy)

@rish — please don’t overlook Clanker tokenholders in this transition and address this soon. Yes, Clanker existed before buybacks, but the market always priced in eventual buybacks. That expectation is why holders stayed and momentum built. Right now Clanker earns fees that flow back into buybacks. That flywheel is the core utility of the token. Keeping fees for yourselves destroys every holder—and the token is already bleeding from uncertainty. This isn’t about “incendiary commentary.” It’s about aligning incentives. The model is powerful: Clanker usage → fees → buybacks → stronger token → more builders + users → more Farcaster activity. That flywheel attracts people into Farcaster, not away. Very few projects have something this clean in place. Clanker has potential to be one of the best-performing tokens in the ecosystem because of this structure. Please don’t take that away—lean into it. Clarity on buybacks and tokenholder alignment in the roadmap would be appreciated.

• 0 replies
• 1 recast
• 1 reaction