Farcaster Union

Someone implement:

An unfollow rule.

Please if person A doesn’t engage in X amt of time with person B

the follower is removed

stream of conscious writer, musician, & artist | co-founder of /wac

jacque

Interests: crypto, economics, TA & blockchain related innovations | 🔗 https://linktr.ee/cryptonjal 🔗 https://dune.com/nhejyht

Not a lot. It gradually changes over time. Mostly I get triggered by something (e.g. an unfollow where the caster who unfollows  hardly seems familiar to me). 

Maybe @warpl.eth or @dosir van help you with the gas problem

Do you switch who you follow and unfollow a lot? 

Thank you for the warpie

Also, I wish that my arttip was working again. I can’t load it up with gas for some reason and it’s been over a week.

LOL, I couldn't capture in an algorithm who I follow or unfollow.
ArtFlipper

day job pays the bills, night job builds the future

Purple Reign

[artist and dev] <>building things. chilling in tub often. doing things I like</>

Also that needs a signer to auto unfollow 🤔 I don’t know exactly the data our fren has :) but he has all follows and all interactions. Guess he will come here soon

can he programmatically create if somebody doesn’t engage with an account in a month that they automatically unfollowed them? That would be insane and also amazing. I guess it’s something you’d have to opt into though?

I find that there’s so many bubbles that breaking out of what we’re currently viewing and what the algorithm deems is worthy to show us versus, but you may want to see is such a huge discrepancy. But even when I did my experiment and technically haven’t followed back and probably won’t everyone that I did before I was still not seeing those casters when I was following less than 10 people 50 people 100 people etc. etc.

When I look at some casters that are getting a decent amount of likes and comments, it seem like it’s lacking in true and authentic engagement. At times and that’s worrisome as well cause that definitely leads to engagement baiting.

Yes part of me wishes. I had it in my ability to obtain that as well however, I would prefer having meaningful and deeper connections.

design / bodybuilding / prev waterfall.market

I find that there’s so many bubbles that breaking out of what we’re currently viewing and what the algorithm deems is worthy to show us versus, but you may want to see is such a huge discrepancy. But even when I did my experiment and technically haven’t followed back and probably won’t everyone that I did before I was still not seeing those casters when I was following less than 10 people 50 people 100 people etc. etc.

When I look at some casters that are getting a decent amount of likes and comments, it seem like it’s lacking in true and authentic engagement. At times and that’s worrisome as well cause that definitely leads to engagement baiting.

Yes part of me wishes. I had it in my ability to obtain that as well however, I would prefer having meaningful and deeper connections. https://paragraph.com/@jacque/algorthm-experiment?referrer=0x20Da700EA03E9fe8bf3409d6F66105184AEfB2FC

That would be a cool idea only if you could install your own algorithm. As long as there is an algorithm controlling visibility, if following is impacted by that then naturally the most engaged with people become more engaged with as time goes on.