Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
Jacek.degen.eth π©
@jacek
1/3 Degen Grants & Airdrop 3 β Need Feedback! We want Airdrop 3 to fund Degen builders through a structured grant system. Weβll post Statements of Work (SOW), devs will submit proposals & qualifications, and the community votes on who gets the bounty. Voting power is based on $DEGEN or locked $DEGEN. Thoughts?
41 replies
56 recasts
172 reactions
Jacek.degen.eth π©
@jacek
2/3 This ensures fair funding, efficient dev selection, and no duplicate work. Instead of multiple devs competing for the same task, the community selects the best proposal, and the chosen dev gets to work. Are there platforms that support this model? Any concerns or improvements youβd suggest? Let us know!
1 reply
3 recasts
27 reactions
Jacek.degen.eth π©
@jacek
3/3 We want Airdrop 3 to empower builders, ensuring a transparent & community-driven process. Devs submit their proposals & qualifications, the community picks the best fit, and work starts. Would love your feedback before we roll this out! What do you think?
4 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
Jacek.degen.eth π©
@jacek
@downshift.eth @jpren.eth @jesse.base.eth @woj @macbudkowski @edit @fookinnowan @0xen @billzh @purp @joeblau @kenny @we @cryptowenmoon.eth @nonlinear.eth @yuga @nick @yekim.eth @yes2crypto.eth @limone.eth @samuellhuber.eth @ahn.eth @matthewfox @robrecht @linda
9 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Mac Budkowski
@macbudkowski
Is it going to be a retro or proactive funding? I'd lean into retro because it's much more efficient
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fookinnowan π©π΅
@fookinnowan
The idea of having several people or everybody building the same stuff like what is happening now (similar degen frames with different UI) is great. Just not sure on the selection voting process if it can be done in a fair way
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
XBorn ID
@xbornid.eth
go go go @kenny @ahn.eth π©
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xtom.base.eth π©
@croth.eth
Not all mentions worked @jacek 10 max per cast
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
