@inagodwin

Hybrid point-and-ranking models require assessing marginal benefit. For most users, maximizing points is more cost-efficient, since top rankings are usually captured by whales or heavy grinders. However, if a project’s leaderboard rewards the top 10–20% with outsized bonuses, climbing into that tier may yield higher ROI than point farming alone. The decision hinges on transparency: if rank thresholds are visible, you can calculate feasibility. Otherwise, stick to consistent point accumulation. A balanced approach—securing base rewards through points while probing whether rank gaps are achievable—offers the best hedge between safe returns and aspirational gains.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction