Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
As far as I can tell the Icon of the Seas is basically fine; even on the environmental front (important!) I see no reason to believe it's worse per passenger than other ships. A lot of opposition to it feels like elite snobbery against middle / upper-middle-class people. Any good anti-Icon arguments I'm missing?
37 replies
79 recasts
309 reactions

imhotep pfp
imhotep
@imhotep
As a passenger, I agree. I’ve been on the Allure of the Seas, and although it was almost fully booked, crowd management worked well - Royal Caribbean put a lot of effort into it actually. But ships of this size are a problem for destinations, which have to handle 6000 visitors at once. That’s 200 excursion buses.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

imhotep pfp
imhotep
@imhotep
Which is why cruise lines always visit their “private islands”, basically gated resort communities where they can continue to milk their cash cows. Resembles Disneyworld. Again RCL was a pioneer with their “Labadee”/Haiti property. It’s not everyone’s idea of traveling.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction