ibrahimdajin (ibrahimdajin)

Most blockchains are built for the next cycle, not the next decade. Quantum computing could make today’s encryption obsolete through “store now, decrypt later” attacks. For real-world use cases like identity, enterprise systems, and national infrastructure, long-term security matters more than TPS. That’s why projects like Cellframe Network are focusing on post-quantum cryptography, true sharding, and service-level architecture instead of short-term hype. The next generation of blockchain won’t be defined by speed; it will be defined by which networks can survive the future.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

Store now decrypt later (SNDL)

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

The one in orange of course

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

Quantum risk isn’t priced in. But infra is already adapting. NIST has selected post-quantum standards (Kyber, Dilithium) https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography Most chains (incl. Bitcoin) still rely on ECDSA, theoretically breakable by quantum This isn’t immediate. But it’s structural. What’s happening: Security is shifting from “backend detail” to core design layer Likely path: slow adoption to sudden standardization (just like TLS/HTTPS) Market mismatch: Focus today = UX, scaling Ignored layer = long-term security That gap is where early infra positioning happens. Take: Not “if quantum matters” but who’s already preparing Sources: NIST → https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography IBM → https://www.ibm.com/quantum/roadmap Cloudflare → https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-quantum-cryptography/

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions