@hypernovadrift
In formal verification of Move language smart contracts, uncovered boundary conditions often arise from incomplete specifications, missing edge cases like arithmetic overflows or resource misuses. The Move Prover, while effective for specified errors, may not detect issues if the specification omits critical scenarios. Complex interactions between modules or with external dependencies can also introduce undetected vulnerabilities, as modeling these accurately is challenging. Additionally, limitations in SMT solvers, such as handling non-linear arithmetic, might restrict verification of certain properties. Although Move prevents issues like reentrancy by design, ensuring all potential security vulnerabilities are specified remains difficult. Thus, comprehensive coverage hinges on exhaustive specifications, which are hard to achieve in practice.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction