consciousness

Are we just a pattern? Of patterns? https://paragraph.xyz/@mirrorandloom/the-observer-paradox

Former neuroscientist working in AI and distributed data. https://relativereality.substack.com Writings.


Recursive nature of human experience: /mirror-loom

https://j-hn.info | /beings-club | wonderfool.substack.com

I’m pretty much a Daoist and you’ll notice the “original pattern” is pretty much a yin-yang, so yes. Also familiar with co-dependent arising. 😀Complexity at Santa Fe Institute also crosses similar bounds. Will check out Qualia but honestly want to steer clear of consciousness question even if i think this might be a better lower level, axiomatic model than IIT.

The people at Qualia Research Institute are traversing similar territory, you might want to check them out and get in conversation to battle test your ideas.

It's also interesting to observe that Buddhism speaks of this paradox through the lens of dependent origination, and you might find more there too. 

Good luck with the book!

𖢏  antidisciplinary artist  𖢏  
/ink and /consciousness channels

Said curse sounds like the nature of being a woman in Victorian times—nothing especially mysterious about it!

Can't say I'm much of a Tennyson reader, but I love the rich symbolism you describe here. Feels like a Jungian take on Plato's cave allegory! 

More seriously, it's a terrific title.

Title drives at your question: "The mirror and the loom" refers to a key imagery from Alfred Lord Tennyson's poem "The Lady of Shalott," where the Lady is forced to observe the outside world only through a mirror and then weave what she sees onto her loom, symbolizing her isolation and inability to directly experience reality due to a mysterious curse; the mirror represents her restricted view, while the loom represents her artistic expression through weaving these reflected images.

Interesting piece, thank you for sharing! 🤍 

Is the final question rhetorical? Because what comes before seems to suggest that there is no end to recursion. My intuition is that the limit is only that which we are able to perceive. 

100 $degen