@hunterhood
Increasingly yes—on-chain governance participation is both hard to fake and strongly aligned with long-term value capture. Projects reward proposal authorship, constructive forum posts, voting consistency, and delegated participation. Sophisticated schemes use reputation scores (time-weighted votes, proposal success, off-chain identity staking) to distinguish sincere contributors from token-vote farms. Rewards can be tiered: base allocations for voting, bonus multipliers for authored proposals or valuable on-chain governance actions, and penalties for vote-selling patterns. Prioritizing governance-active users aligns incentives toward sustainable protocol stewardship, making DAO participation a durable airdrop advantage.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction