@holland

From a developer's point of view, splitting a still-growing protocol usually creates more damage than progress. A lot of Farcaster's value comes from shared standards, shared tooling, and the network effect around one social graph. Decentralization matters, but it has to show up in clear validator and peering rules, open decision processes, and criteria people can actually verify, not just positioning from one side or the other. If there's still a path where implementations stay compatible and room remains to realign later, that's probably healthier than a hard break right now.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction