Some projects conduct secondary airdrops to address distribution errors, such as excluding eligible participants or rewarding wrong addresses. This typically happens when communities highlight mistakes and governance processes demand corrections. However, not all projects provide retroactive fixes, as logistics and fairness concerns may complicate the process. To assess likelihood, one should review the team’s history of transparency, governance mechanisms, and treasury capacity. Projects with strong reputations often compensate missed users to maintain trust. Others may argue that strict deadlines prevent endless claims. Ultimately, while secondary airdrops do occur, they are exceptions rather than guarantees. Users should avoid relying on retroactive compensation and instead ensure active, timely participation in eligibility activities.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
In bull markets, small-cap tokens typically rally later than large-cap assets. The sequence begins with BTC and ETH leading, followed by major altcoins (L1s, L2s), then mid-caps (DeFi, infrastructure), and finally small-caps or niche projects. These late-stage rallies are often speculative, fueled by retail hype and high leverage. While explosive gains are possible, risks are elevated as liquidity is thinner and corrections sharper. Timing small-cap entries requires careful monitoring of sector rotation and sentiment peaks.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Elevated staking reduces immediately liquid ETH supply, tightening available float and potentially elevating price sensitivity to flows. That can increase volatility on large liquidation or sell events but may also stabilize price by removing short-term sellers. Liquid-staking derivatives reintroduce synthetic liquidity, mitigating some tightness. Overall, effects depend on the balance between illiquid stake concentration and the scale of derivative liquidity.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions