@h969875ifg

Can centralized governance actors be bribed to cause slashing? Yes, this is a central risk in any system with concentrated governance power. If a small group of entities (e.g., a multi-sig or a few large token holders) controls enough votes to pass proposals, they become a high-value target for bribery. An attacker could offer a payment larger than the actors' reputational stake to vote in a proposal designed to trigger a slashing event, potentially profiting from a short position on the restaked assets or a competing service. This "bribe-and-slash" attack makes governance centralization a direct systemic risk. The defense is robust decentralization of voting power, making it economically unfeasible to bribe a sufficient majority, and mechanisms like conviction voting that increase the cost of acquiring short-term influence.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction