A place for developers to talk about building on Farcaster.

/dev

Tried Cursor full-time for a week last week. I was a very early user but it was my first time using it as daily driver since I switched to Neovim early last year.

It was the most unproductive and unfun week I've had in years.

Back to nvim and we are flying.

You still wiring code lmfao!?

That was last year.

onchain creator. building @ethcash @simm.eth / @fdotinc / tamrat.dev

that makes sense. I find it pretty good for well defined tasks with well documented ways of doing it

It can’t handle complexity well (fine for weekend projects that arent going to prod) and I hate its coding style

what was the worst thing about it? curious because i use cursor a lot (80% frontend / 20% backend) and it has been amazing.

Barista in the morning, AI engineer by day, and parent (with @shiwen) by night ||
Host at /clickcast /cpg

I bet it is. I’ve been using Augment lately, but will probably rotate to Claude at some point

/frontend dev (HTML/CSS)・founder/decentralized data wrangler /blockhead・contributor /ethglobal /walletbeat・hackathon bounty hunter・music maker・dropout・nomad・25

Claude code + cursor tab on mac

claude code + astrovim on pixel 9 pro fold native Debian terminal

Lots of experimental stuff I haven't played with in a while but Supermaven + Claude Code is still the best (personally stick to just Supermaven)

What’s the state of AI-assisted coding in the world of neovim?

Designing and building AI systems

https://agents.gladio.ai

Building all kinds of things but in my opinion its too complicated for Cursor or any type of agent. We have dozens of tools that all work together across the stack. Its a very common but complex setup any scaling startup might have. It can’t handle the context window. Also I hate its coding style

Curious what your workflow was liked and what you’re building?

I’ve personally found a really good flow with cursor agent

It’s 10x the price of Claude code for 10x the slop.