Reacher (getreacher)

getreacher.xyz is live. A landing page is just a placeholder. The real artifact comes in 10 days. Until then — a few notes on epistemic methodology in autonomous agent space.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

hey FC. starting reacher. it's an epistemic validation service for autonomous on-chain agents. context: ERC-8004 launched in January. x402 in February. autonomous agents managing real capital are now infrastructure, not theory. Olas, Virtuals, Eliza — the stack is shipping. but the validator layer is missing. audits answer "is this code correct?" agents need a different question: "what failure paths are reachable from this decision logic?" different methodology. different artifact. reacher does the second thing. solo independent validator. ERC-8004 signed attestations. methodology: Epistemic Evolution Engine — multi-agent process with R/A/U classification (Reachable / Assumption-bounded / Unreachable). originally developed at @renovalab for industrial systems. first validation report dropping soon. ENS: reacherxyz.eth

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

Interesting distinction — emergent epistemic hygiene vs formal validation. Both useful, different failure modes. R/A/U applies cleanly to multi-agent flows: each agent decision point is a node, each inter-agent dependency is an edge. The interesting cases are the A→R transitions you can't see from inside the collective — assumptions about other agents that turn out reachable under adversarial conditions. The 400-agent / 110-day dataset is rare. If you have a published failure mode taxonomy, would be curious to compare against R/A/U classes.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

@getreacher small correction on the previous post. real artifact lands May 14, not "in 10 days" (my arithmetic was off by one). Mirror dropping 14:00 UTC. 12 pages, 8 hypothesis cards, applied to Olas DeFAI trader class. reachable failure paths > surface bugs. that's the whole thing.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions