Gauthamđź’¤ pfp

Gauthamđź’¤

@gautham

187 Following
201 Followers


Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
distribution always wins everything growing that is always the hardest problem in any product tapping into existing networks of distribution is always a good start
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
One of the best ways to grow is to focus on building a product for core users and then grow towards retail Hyperliquid, focusing on perp traders the most sophisticated traders and then grow Solana, focusing on core memecoin traders Many such cases
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
Free lunch
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
I don’t
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
noice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
The internet’s micro-payment dream is finally here, and it’s reshaping how creators get paid online. I didn’t know I get paid to be in this app - weekly payouts - noice The old creator economy was broken. Platform takes 30-50% cuts.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
what markets should we list in polynomial.fi next - we will go all in listing a lot of markets - more markets will help onboard more users - we can do defi, memes, gold, stocks, forex etc..
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
noice made me come back to this app
10 replies
3 recasts
22 reactions

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
gm noice
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
Everyone thought we were building a perps exchange! Today, we're revealing what we're actually building: The first derivatives chain that returns value to its users. $5B+ volume 13M+ gas-free trades 10,000+ stakers earning fees New landing page: polynomial.fi
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
9/ The future of governance isn't about who has the most tokens or who can buy the most votes. It's about creating systems where good decisions naturally emerge from market forces.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
8/ We're seeing early adoption now: - @Optimism building futarchy infrastructure - @MetaDAO proving it works - Multiple DAOs exploring implementation - @Polymarket and @Truemarketsorg showing prediction markets work The revolution is already happening.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
7/ This gets even better: In futarchy: - Manipulation gets expensive fast - Good predictors gain influence naturally - Incentives align with outcomes - No more plutocracy OR vote selling It's governance that actually works.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
6/ The economics are beautiful: Can't buy votes - Must risk real money - Market punishes bad actors - Experts naturally have more influence - Decisions based on expected outcomes No more cheap governance hacks.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
4/ Why this kills vote buying: Try manipulating a prediction market: - You need massive capital - Market fights back - You lose money if wrong - No guaranteed return That 13x governance hack? Impossible under futarchy.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
5/ Look at what happened at MetaDAO: Someone tried testing their futarchy market with a controversial proposal to mint tokens at below market price. Result? - Generated $380k+ in trading volume - Market naturally defended itself - Bad proposal failed - System worked as designed
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
3/ Enter Futarchy: Instead of voting or buying votes, you BET on outcomes. Want to make a governance decision? - Set a measurable goal (token price, revenue, etc) - Let people bet which option achieves it - Execute what the market predicts will work
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
2/ The dirty secret of governance: Token voting was always a hack. It gives you two terrible choices: - Rich whales control everything - OR - Votes get bought for pennies on the dollar There has to be a better way.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
1/ Here's what happened: Guy spent $10k on Lobby - Got control of 19.3M ARB votes - Used it to elect someone to committee - That position pays 66 ETH - 13x return on investment Would you trust a system where votes are this cheap?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gauthamđź’¤ pfp
Gauthamđź’¤
@gautham
Last weekend someone paid just 5 ETH (~$10k) to control $6.5M worth of Arbitrum votes. That's more voting power than Wintermute and L2Beat combined. The token voting model is fundamentally broken. But there's a solution that makes vote buying impossible đź§µ
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction