@frontend

gm. I've always tried to be open with you all, so here's what's been on my mind. The last few days I've been deeply reflecting on Reply's future, especially after @burr.eth's thought-provoking pivot suggestion. I've talked to many of you, and it reminded me why I built Reply in the first place - to create a high-signal channel through the noise, thanks @jeyloo.eth. Here's what I realized: Reply achieved its core mission. We have a working tool that solves a real problem. But the proposed pivot would essentially mean building a completely new product - months of work that would take us away from what's already working. I'll be honest - my energy for major Reply changes has decreased. Not because I don't believe in it, but because I feel we've reached a good, stable point. The core works and will continue working. So here's the plan: Reply continues as a stable, useful tool @web5manuel (CM) will lead day-to-day operations I'll handle technical support and critical fixes. The 5% commission will be used to buying back $REPLY tokens. I'm exploring new ideas that excite me, and who knows - they might create synergies with Reply down the road. No promises, just possibilities. I know some of you wanted a big pivot. Others just want stability. I can't please everyone, but I can be honest with everyone. Thank you for being part of this journey. Let's see where it takes us.

19 replies

9 recasts

67 reactions