Brian Flynn pfp
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
the reason believe is attractive to AI builders is because builders are looking for alternatives to VC. building apps no longer suits the venture model when there are no moats. valuing things based off the DCFs of an app is likely the endgame
4 replies
4 recasts
49 reactions

Yitong pfp
Yitong
@yitong
hmmmm disagree. believe has fit with AI builders cause it's easy to yeet out an app with AI with relatively little work that you can then later abandon when the coin price tanks
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
What do you think about adverse selection? Founders that build valuable products can raise, those too bad & highly opportunistic that want to make a quick Buck launch a memecoin instead. That said, it‘s good to see products somewhat attached to tokens. Think we can hope for some value for Token holders, Not Necessarily revenues, but maybe some utility & in the best case Integration in products or economies around products.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Goat Trading pfp
Goat Trading
@goattrading
This isn't unique to Believe though, is it? @virtualsprotocol.eth @clanker @bnkr @productclank and many other launchpads all do the same. Totally agree VC is going to be in a hard place as building becomes cheaper and cheaper (although I do think normal token markets aren't going to be the endgame), but not sure why Believe is unique in any way here.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

SQX pfp
SQX
@sqx
So lots of donuts.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction