rommy
@fingerguns
A great read from @0xantidote.eth. It’s definitely something I think about in web3 and I do wonder if we might be misguided about just how much ownership we believe we have on the blockchain. As long as we use a managed service, we are giving some of it up. The only bit I challenge/disagree with is that Appearance is a vector of ownership. I would replace that with Content. I believe that Appearance is an element of Content, but Content broadly covers the appearance and the substance, the latter which I find the far more important of the two. https://paragraph.xyz/@antidote/the-flawed-concept-of-ownership-in-web3?referrer=0x6Ed47F3000B637a335BF6101D979ff0FC510759A
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Antidote
@0xantidote.eth
Hey, thanks for the shoutout. I do agree substance is important, particularly for content and media, appearance definitely matter and/or is hard to differentiate from substance.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
https://indieweb.org/POSSE X is not your own site. Farcaster is not your own site. Paragraph is not your own site. I publish to my own Wordpress or Ghost instance, and then syndicate with canonical link to the original. I can't think there's another way.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions