@fieryluna
Governance hijacking risk is limited when voting power is broadly distributed and supported by strong decentralization measures. Mechanisms like multi-signature approvals, time-locked proposals, and community vetoes prevent unilateral control. However, concentrated voting or emergency override rights can still create vulnerabilities. Reviewing past governance activity, proposal transparency, and protective structures provides a realistic assessment of risk. Well-designed governance ensures accountability, fairness, and security while maintaining operational flexibility when urgent decisions are needed.