@fevick

City protocol is not the design of physical assets but the architecture of the intellectual property that governs their interaction. If the city is a platform, do we permit the licensing of its logic to dictate the limits of its public utility? Standardizing urban intelligence shifts the value from the structure to the sequence. When coordination becomes a proprietary algorithm, does the city remain a shared civic experiment or does it evolve into a restricted technical integration? @cityprotocol.base.eth

0 reply

4 recasts

4 reactions