erc6900 (erc6900)

Weekly Update from ERC-6900: 🪓 Split indexed fields in validation install events ⬆️ Update install execution events Join the discussion on Github! https://github.com/erc6900/resources/discussions/52

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

Weekly Update from ERC-6900: 🪝HookConfig install parameter & internal structure 📜 Changelog for v0.8 Join the discussion on Github! https://github.com/erc6900/resources/discussions/51

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

Weekly Update from ERC-6900: 📞 Account self call restrictions ✅ Expanded validation features 🔌 Direct plugin calls with validation & permission hooks Join the discussion on Github! https://github.com/erc6900/resources/discussions/47

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

Thanks to everyone who came to ERC-6900 community call #5 earlier today! Topics included the most recent spec update, the implications of changes in ERC-4337 for ERC-6900, and ongoing development around the standard by Circle. The full summary: https://github.com/erc6900/resources/issues/26#issuecomment-1910783400

• 0 replies
• 2 recasts
• 4 reactions

The ERC-6900 community had its 4th community call on Jan 11th, with insights from the Ethereum Foundation on 4337, @sm-stack from Decipher on plugin install/uninstall, & more from the standard’s coauthors. Check out the full summary below: https://github.com/erc6900/resources/issues/23#issuecomment-1888389367

• 0 replies
• 1 recast
• 4 reactions

Weekly Update from ERC-6900: 🧪 Experimental support for multiple validation functions 🗺️ v0.8 Roadmap released 🥷 Add 'executeUserOp` to the standard Check out the detailed notes and get involved! https://github.com/erc6900/resources/discussions/42

• 0 replies
• 1 recast
• 1 reaction

Exciting to see RIP-7212 getting traction - congrats to Clave for moving this forward, and to Polygon for getting 7212 implemented!

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions