From Users to Co-Architects: Why Feedback is the Missing Layer in AI Design Real intelligence needs dynamic feedback. Most systems still treat users as passive endpoints, not active participants. But what if feedback itself became infrastructure? What if your suggestion to an AI system could be: – Audited for logic and originality – Tested against alternative versions (A/B style) – Scored for real-world impact – Verified by a network of trusted humans and AIs – And rewarded onchain? We’re heading toward a world where feedback becomes a public good; tracked, composable, and reputation-linked. Add to this a layer of Intelligence Oracles. Imagine exporting your own ChatGPT conversations to decentralized LLMs; contributing to an intellectual fingerprint. It’s the architecture for a world where users aren’t just consumers of intelligence, but its co-architects. You’re not just data. You’re proof of thought. https://choconuts.substack.com/p/from-users-to-co-architects-feedback
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Provenance would be a great feature for @zora creators. Where there can be derivative content with derivative royalties.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
If I copy a tweet and paste it into farcaster, theres a very nice display of the preview. Need something like this for Zora, where if we take the asset and paste the link to @farcaster or X(twitter) we see a preview, so users can go on to zora and then possible purchase a share of the artifact.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions