The core issue with the curation vault model lies in the illusion of isolation. Curators are meant to manage distinct strategies and segregate risk, yet in practice, they all end up supplying liquidity to the same underlying lending markets. What is designed to promote diversification instead concentrates exposure, turning one curator’s stress into everyone’s problem. Despite being framed as modular and independent, the model inherently links all vaults through shared borrower pools. Liquidity from multiple curators merges into a single system, so the decisions or withdrawals of one can ripple instantly across all others as we see with recent issues with xUSD and similar assets. Even a cautious curator cannot escape the fallout from a more aggressive participant operating within the same pool. When confidence falters or withdrawals accelerate, these shared markets seize up. Utilization shoots to 100%, redemptions grind to a halt, and borrowing rates spike to unsustainable levels. Just use Aave.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
I’m in ON mode to join @MorphLayer’s evolution into the settlement layer for global payment networks. 🐨
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Before going to bed, a friend sent me the victim's statement. In fact, I immediately instructed our operations and security teams to intervene. I respect the accounts of real victims—but not uninvestigated media reports or obvious bot comments. That's what makes me laugh: someone exploiting the victim's words for their own ends. I want to express my stance to all affected users. We are conducting a thorough and serious investigation into the causes. If GMGN is found to bear even 1% of responsibility, I commit to providing 100% compensation. This will not take long. We will provide a conclusion within a few hours.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions