@eduardmsmr

i've always thought that the intent behind how i use an AI tool is what defines the piece of art or anything else i am working on. it's what makes it resonate or fall flat. AI is a tool i use as an extension of my thinking, or as a way to finally realize things i've always envisioned but never had the skills to create myself. because intent is essential to me, i'm always looking for tools that preserve the emotional depth i'm trying to put into the work. that's why i prefer Midjourney over Nano Banana, which is what everyone seems to be using now. Midjourney allows for more personalization and i find it to respond to my prompting sensibility, interpreting things in ways i can shape and steer. the outputs carry my "flaws" rather than flattening them into something polished. none of my pieces are aesthetically perfect, and that's intentional. Nano Banana offers more perfection, which is sometimes useful, but it lacks emotional depth which is one of the most important things in my work. i see some tools as made for creating art, and others as designed for content. my point is this: AI art, when made with real intent, is art. and by intent i mean that the work reflects something that existed in me before the tool touched it. the AI executes, but i'm the source of the thing's meaning. that's different from typing a generic prompt and posting whatever comes out. AI gives people like me the opportunity to make visible what we've carried in our minds for years. it also allows for the creation of things that simply weren't possible before. whether we're making art or just content, that's up to us. and this has always been true of every tool that ever entered the creative space and changed what artists could do.🌹

0 reply

1 recast

4 reactions