@duncanhornby
protocol teams increasingly reward ecosystem builders and cross-chain liquidity movers, so interacting with multiple messaging/bridge layers can compound eligibility signals. Bridges demonstrate interoperability behavior: users who bridge assets, message across chains, and use cross-chain composability are economically valuable to multi-chain projects. That said, stacking benefits depend on project intent: some projects explicitly reward bridge usage; others penalize obvious bridge-hopping if it looks like farming. Depth matters too — sustained liquidity provisioning across bridges, not just one-off transfers, carries more weight. Finally, well-crafted Sybil controls often de-emphasize mere bridging frequency and instead credit value-weighted, diverse cross-chain engagements.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction