@doloresrichards

Neither is universally superior—value depends on a protocol’s objectives. Breadth proves cross-chain composability, bootstraps liquidity across ecosystems, and matters for interoperability protocols; depth demonstrates sticky users, protocol economic commitment, and is critical for DeFi/L2 cores. Best practice: hybrid scoring that rewards both—assign base credit for unique chains used and escalating multipliers for depth on primary chains (time-weighted TVL, repeated high-value interactions). This balances discovering genuine multi-chain adopters and deep, economically meaningful participants, while deterring dispersion via many low-value micro-tx.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction