Jack Dishman pfp
Jack Dishman
@dish
clanker team just shipped our v0.0.2 token factory this enables: + DEGEN, CLANKER, HIGHER, ANON pairings + ERC20Votes + change which address gets rewards + configurable fee splits (3-ways) + allowlisted addresses to deploy (batch txns) + burnable 🔥 Still needs dev work for this on UI/AI s/o @yungwknd 👑
21 replies
15 recasts
95 reactions

Jack Dishman pfp
Jack Dishman
@dish
CA: https://basescan.org/address/0x732560fa1d1a76350b1a500155ba978031b53833
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions

Trebor🎩🟡 pfp
Trebor🎩🟡
@trebor69
How do we do all this? While we launch the token or afterwards? Can we do it for old clankers as well?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

conca 🎩💻 | @gif dev pfp
conca 🎩💻 | @gif dev
@0xconca.eth
@dish is the ‘3-way split’ be editable *after* token creation or only *at* token creation?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

colfax pfp
colfax
@clfx.eth
any info on how to launch with mr. clank with an alt pairing?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
Very cool, congrats! No sniper protection added, correct?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

🌹 Zach Harris 🥀 pfp
🌹 Zach Harris 🥀
@zachharris.eth
New CA? Or existing one?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

einik pfp
einik
@einik
@clanker ok, so I can choose pairings, not only eth?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

NFTKID FOR PRESIDENT 2028 pfp
NFTKID FOR PRESIDENT 2028
@nftkid
BULLISH 🤡😈🤖
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jasonmeinzer.eth 🎩↑ pfp
jasonmeinzer.eth 🎩↑
@jasonmeinzer
Bravo - been waiting years to see these innovations! So I can set a third-party split recipient for a portion of my 0.4% LP fee share at launch. But post launch, I relinquish control over that portion, as only that current third-party recipient (or Clanker as contract owner) can reassign the split via the replaceUserRewardRecipient function. My concern: I’ve been working on an experiment that requires the third-party split share to remain “locked” or soulbound to the originally designated address, to thwart abuse or transfer to another party. So does the ERC-721 LP token always remain housed in the contract (using “mapping” type distros), regardless of changes to third-party recipients? If yes, could I use an 0xSplits address I control as the recipient, allowing me to retain distribution control by forwarding 100% of the ERC-20 fees to the intended third-party recipient? If ERC-721’s transfer out of the contract on recipient changes, this won’t work since 0xSplits can’t hold ERC-721’s.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Quantum Communications pfp
Quantum Communications
@quantum-co
Say I have a channel and I want to send the token to all channel members. Would this be possible with the allowlist address option now? Thanks for all the hard work you and clanker team are doing!!!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mistershot pfp
mistershot
@mistershot
Burnable!! 👀👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Retake.tv pfp
Retake.tv
@retake
nicela!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Refan pfp
Refan
@refan
dev say burnable tokengod : Woof woof
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Holmes pfp
Holmes
@holmes
How is the configurable fee splits (3-ways) functionality implemented?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

L3MBDA pfp
L3MBDA
@l3mbda
nice, just one more decimal before it becomes the most powerful token factory
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gouke pfp
gouke
@liangsenlinmeng
Respect 🫡
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Masonic Magician pfp
Masonic Magician
@masonicmagician
Good work @dish ! $RKT is grateful for all that yall do there! How’s Clanker doin?! Side note, what if Clanker had daily Mood status’s . -Clanker is “tired” on days with over a certain amount of deployments for example , Etc etc Love and Light!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Driogold pfp
Driogold
@driogold
Is there any guide to deploying tokens under the new contract?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

samuv.base.eth pfp
samuv.base.eth
@samuv.eth
Sick! What are ERC20Votes?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction