Dilly (dilly-27)

Dilly

Part-time trivia nerd

174 Followers

Recent casts

@zama has cool tech Not just crypto native talking about it but in general i see smart people from Microsoft and other big organization praising their tech Def a good one from my perspective as well. Most of privacy driven Blockchain or encryption/ decryption related chains tries to build their own layer of chain. Zama didnt do that instead they build a layer that can be wrapped on existing codebase or language. So you dont need to learn the whole complexity but follow certain change of what is required in order to achieve that functionalities. From a dev perspective comes with lots of use case example- Fraud proof and verifiable (you wanna setup a casino thats fair and not driven by your logic use fhevm your guess are private and no one can decode and its fair ) From investment and money grabs opportunities you can look the same as that applies to entire Blockchain.

  • 0 replies
  • 0 recasts
  • 2 reactions

It seems almost impossible to believe a chain no one has heard of or used has more TVL than the entire Robinhood chain. Provenance has just 2 Protocols with a TVL of $1.855b, while Robinhood, with an entire stack of 202m protocols, has just $631.29m in TVL.

  • 0 replies
  • 0 recasts
  • 0 reactions

t's interesting to see how much L2BEAT has evolved from only L2s to other interesting sectors like Privacy and now "Interop", and if Modularity was still at its hype peak, Circle's CCTP would have already won the war. The top route by vol: Hyperliquid <> Arbitrum. And Hyperliquid continues its domination.

  • 0 replies
  • 2 recasts
  • 9 reactions

Top casts

t's interesting to see how much L2BEAT has evolved from only L2s to other interesting sectors like Privacy and now "Interop", and if Modularity was still at its hype peak, Circle's CCTP would have already won the war. The top route by vol: Hyperliquid <> Arbitrum. And Hyperliquid continues its domination.

  • 0 replies
  • 2 recasts
  • 9 reactions

while most crypto dapps struggle to maintain a user retention of 1-5% @fomo nearly doubles that makes you think about the best way to onboard retail

  • 0 replies
  • 3 recasts
  • 6 reactions

The real bottleneck in tokenised credit is the capital that sits idle waiting for settlement. ➥ Distributed RWA value is already ~$36.8B ➥ Tokenised credit is multi billion and growing Yet every leveraged strategy on assets with T+ settlement creates a temporary funding hole. Keeping dedicated capital parked to cover that hole destroys the economics and that structural gap is why most institutional RWA leverage still lives offchain.

  • 0 replies
  • 2 recasts
  • 9 reactions

Most LP setups still ask you to deposit tokens into a pool, but @1inch Aqua takes a pretty different approach I’ve been testing it mainly with one thing in mind which is optimising for Aqua rewards rather than maximising swap fees. Right now I’m running 1INCH/USDT and 1INCH/WETH positions on Ethereum with $1,811 in pullable liquidity backing $3,402 across 4 positions and $10,163 in filled volume over the last 7D.

  • 0 replies
  • 1 recast
  • 8 reactions

Onchain profile

Ethereum addresses