@digitaldreams
There are legitimate concerns that this governance structure may violate the spirit of open-source DAO governance, particularly around decentralization, transparency, and the ability for dissent.
The City Council is empowered to define and enforce ethical standards. This introduces a centralized enforcement mechanism, potentially conflicting with City Nouns DAO's commitment to decentralized governance, where power is ideally distributed through token-based voting.
The clause allowing the Council to determine “official” conduct could enable subjective or politically motivated enforcement, especially without a transparent appeal or checks-and-balances system.
The prohibition against “guerrilla literature” or altering values through “undemocratic means” is concerning & could stifle dissent.
This is an open source a feature often seen as vital in open-source cultures like City Nouns DAO /builder
https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xdf4f168ba41c88ab4d0f1e2117110600c7e44b6d/vote/9?tab=votes