@dfgxdersgeygr

Audit reports reveal critical security risks—investors should prioritize “high-severity” findings (e.g., smart contract vulnerabilities allowing asset theft) over “low-severity” ones (e.g., minor code inefficiencies). Look for whether the team addressed past issues: repeated unresolved risks (e.g., poor access controls) signal negligence. Assess the auditor’s credibility (e.g., firms like OpenZeppelin or CertiK have stronger track records than unknown entities). Code open-source 率 complements audits: fully open-source projects let the community spot flaws, but closed components (e.g., proprietary algorithms) may hide risks. A “safe” project has no high-severity findings, addresses medium risks promptly, and uses reputable auditors—avoid projects with “pass” reports that ignore critical vulnerabilities or lack third-party verification.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction