Unpopular Opinion: Small accounts can compete on the ZAMA leaderboard. Looking at the current standings, you’ll notice a lot of smaller creators dominating the top 50 effortlessly. I personally didn’t participate in Szn 4 because I assumed I couldn’t make it into the top 1,000. I was wrong. In less than 40 hours of starting Szn 5, I’m now sitting at #358. Focus on @zama 🔧 Engage with the most popular projects. Right now, #FHE is king and privacy is the hottest topic. Why this works: When a community is booming, everyone is high-energy they want to grow, collaborate, and connect. By engaging with them, following them, and contributing, they’ll reciprocate. Over time, it creates a positive feedback loop. You might not see yourself on the leaderboard in the first few days or even weeks. But: Your account will grow. That growth compounds. Your voice becomes louder and clearer. Your priority should always be growth. the leaderboard will follow. #ZamaCreatorProgram
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
PRIVACY WITHOUT TRUST One of the biggest contradictions in crypto is this: We want blockchains to be transparent, but we also want our data to stay private. Traditionally, you can’t have both. If you put something on-chain, it becomes visible. Balances. Inputs. AI decisions. Contract logic. Everything is exposed to whoever is watching. This is the privacy bottleneck Web3 has lived with for years. And this is exactly where Zama flips the script. With Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), smart contracts can compute on your data while it stays encrypted the entire time. > You send encrypted inputs. > The chain processes them without ever decrypting. The output is encrypted back to you. This is “privacy without trust.” And it’s the first time Web3 has a primitive that actually delivers it. Zama is redefining what it means to build openly and privately at the same time. On-chain doesn’t have to mean exposed. FHE is that difference. And Zama is the one making it real. #ZamaCreatorProgram
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Zama chose long-term security over short-term speed. Today, that decision matters. Why this is important Most privacy protocols in crypto: > would break if large quantum computers became available. > don’t reach full 128-bit strength. > use older assumptions that won’t scale with rising global compute. And upgrading cryptography later is not easy. It usually requires: - new circuits. - new proofs. - new user migrations. > and sometimes breaking compatibility. Zama avoided all of this by building the right foundation from the start. Vitalik’s data on Bitcoin’s 2⁹⁶ hashes basically shows: > The world has far more compute than people realize and it's still growing. When compute grows: - attacks become cheaper. - weak cryptography becomes breakable. - and “good enough for now” stops being good enough. This is why Zama’s approach matters: they don’t need to upgrade to post-quantum security. They already run on it. TL:dr Zama is one of the few privacy
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 1 reaction