founders-club

In our offline chat, I learned that $B3 has a very healthy token distribution. $B3 not only powers governance and staking, but also connects incentive flows across different gamechains.

From a design perspective, how does B3 aim to create an economic system that functions sustainably?

Also, I’d love to hear more about the thinking behind your IGO (Initial Game Offering) module. Letting players support, and even co-launch games with $B3 feels like a powerful step toward your “players as co-builders” vision. How do you see this evolving? @darylx 

在我们的线下沟通中，我了解到 $B3 有着非常健康的token筹码分布。 $B3 除了支援治理与质押，也串联了跨 Gamechain 的激励机制。

在你们的设计逻辑中，B3 如何建立一个不依赖高收益预期、却能自然运作的经济系统？

也想请你们多谈谈 IGO 模块的设计理念，让玩家用 $B3 支持、甚至共同发行游戏，这是否是你们构想中“玩家即建设者” 的一种实现方式？

we realized that in gaming spend per user tends to be lower so focusing on a few big players isn’t enough. you need broad distribution. that’s why we designed b3 to let any chain or gamechain onboard users through $b3 while still sharing in the upside when those users spend elsewhere

to solve the app chain fragmentation problem we built a 30% revenue share model that works like a networked affiliate system. if a chain brings in a player and that player spends on another chain the original chain still gets 30% of the revenue. this breaks the silos we see in traditional app chains where each tries to lock users in. instead it encourages chains to collaborate and grow the whole eco

on igos i think we’re still early. i like a lot of the experiments like believe sahara and indie gg but for gaming no one’s cracked the formula yet. it has to start with good games that people want to play and invest in and i think we’re right at the edge of figuring it out. web2 monetization is really broken for mid si...